In America, and around the world even, today the question of how humanity will conduct itself, is being put to the test. We are challenged with what I define as two choices, choices best described based on a line from a book I read. Given that humans are emotional creatures, a sensation innate in who we are, we inherently find that the easy path is to submit ourselves to those emotional feelings consistently raging within us. Our ability to learn, adjust and adapt, forces us to regularly have to make a choice, as to, whether or not we will do what is right, or what is easy.
So many have simplified these choices, or housed them in religious nomenclatures, all the while ignoring the humanity aspect of what really drives these incessant choices within us all. They’ve been defined as good and evil, right and wrong or conservative or liberal, thus simplistically labeling them and drawing a line in the sand that forces the majority of us all to, pick a side.
This choice of what is right and what is easy, is couched in so many aspects of human life, and having to make these choices are humanities first act of free will that is generally forced upon us by what we, or especially others around us, do or don’t do, beginning in the womb. A mother’s choices about her life affects her unborn child and its developing decision making in the womb, where the child moves our lies peacefully based on the activities of the mother and those around her, or, and more importantly, the necessary factors of growth within the womb that have the predominant say in the action of the child. With all of that, the newly forming lifeform, is establishing that primitive understanding of what is right or what is easy.
I suppose, one of the biggest, and perhaps the most troubling of all of the choices about, what is right or what is easy, and the reason I wrote this piece, is the debated concerning gender identification.
The human bloodline, dates back nearly six million years, to what many call the cousins of humans, whereas humans as we define ourselves today developed traceably, back to about two hundred thousand years ago. Two hundred thousand years, is a long time to answer many of life’s most basic questions, yet we find ourselves pondering this gender question two hundred thousand years later.
Never, in the history of Man, has the ability to differentiate between a man and a woman generated so much debate, but in todays societies a line has been drawn in an ever-changing sand pile, so that two hundred thousand years later, a small section of people have convinced many, that there is a certain level of difficulty in determining who and what in life determines a person’s gender to be.
The simplistic answer to this question lies within human history, where never, and I mean ever, has the man version of our species been the one of the two, to carry within them the newly forming life of a child till birth, and all though you would think this unsophisticated fact would have, long ago, answered this current quandary, it apparently has not.
History and science have clearly defined with 100% certainty, that if the inner workings of an individual allow them to bear a child, that is woman, and if it cannot, that is man. However, the argument that all women cannot bear a child has been bandied about, and though all women may not wish to, or cannot, due to certain parts of their inner workings failure to work properly, does not take away the fact that the tools are in place, but they simply do not function properly, and to argue against that attestation, would be like saying that the blind are not human because they cannot see, given that the vast majority of humans can.
Every human lifeform that has ever existed has been the product of some form of relationship between a man and a woman, without exception. Never have two women created a child through sexual contact, nor have two men ever created a child through sexual contact. This exclusive ability has been clearly defined since the time of our cousins, six million years ago, as the humanoid reproductive method for the human race. In simple terms, humanity would not exist, without this man-woman relationship.
Defining the human reproductive cycle, leads us to a decisive aspect of human life, that coexist with humanity, at its core. Sex is one of those emotional quandaries that has both encouraged and corrupted the human existence. It is a spell that invades the human mind, and is the only thing within the inner self of the human body, mind and soul, that releases a toxin filled with what many have defined as humanities savior and its curse.
This sensational desire is a mechanism that exist as a part of the human DNA makeup, its saving grace has allowed humanity to become what it is today, a society where the greatest minds were born into it, that have helped humanity reach wonderous heights in the advancement of the human race, throughout the history of mankind. However, its curse has allowed for an over populated earth with overcrowded cities and towns throughout the world.
In fact, that aspect of our life is so important that we have come to a point in society that if any suggest that we should put fort an effort to control our populations to decrease starvation and homelessness, you are deemed a racist of some sort. Or, if you try to tell a couple desiring to have sex for the first time, to choose abstinence if you are not ready for a child, to help avoid having an unplanned or unwanted pregnancy and avoid the temptation of potentially killing the child because you’ve been led to believe that it is nothing more than a lump of tissue unworthy of protection, you are defined as a woman hater.
Sex is so essential to the human mind, and plays such a substantial role in the life of every human, with a minuscule exception, that it has in some fashion, been the driving factor behind 99.9% of humanities successes and failures.
Now in our society, the desire to have sex with someone of the same sex has tried to redefine, or more importantly, replace the historical man-woman relationship, as the new norm.
But why? Given the man-woman history of the human race, how is it possible that this could even be considered?
Well, its simple.
Sex, and our supposed human rights to do what we please, which has become the emotional justification for immorality.
Trying to figure out what is right or what is easy has been whittled down to an emotional determining factor. There is nothing in medical scientific history that can explain this obscure obsession with gender confusion, but there is plenty of study about the human mind and its mental obsessions that speaks clearly to our willingness to live in a world where cognitive dissonance allows a person to hold two or more contradicting beliefs, where they are one gender, yet desire to have sex with someone of that same gender, and when confronted with the obvious facts that it benefits none in society but the two performing the function, or the potential health risk of AID’s, or the emotional, cultural and religious taboos, they will try to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort, so they claim that they are not the sex they were born into, but must have the opposite sex hidden within them.
A delusional disorder is a type of serious mental illness, a psychotic sickness where people suffering from it can’t distinguish between what is real, from what is imagined. So, can a person who is born one sex, simply decide by way of a personal choice, that they are the opposite sex? Well, to answer that, you have to look at the standardized definition of a delusional disorder based on legitimate clinical research and its many years classifying it as, the illusional beliefs define in one person thinking themselves to be something they are physically not, and that medical science says is impossible, and thousands of years of human existence has never documented occurring, the answer would have to be, no. The use of words to define oneself, the ability to dress according to one’s beliefs, or even to medically alter once appearance, simply does not modify the true nature of who you are.
There are a great many factors that, no doubt, went into that abstract transformation of a person mentally defining themselves as something other than what they are, so you have to ponder whether or not that decision was right or easy. However, the overwhelming driving factor behind it, I believe, is the one thing that every human is innately, down to their DNA, born with, and it is their sexual desire, which inescapably plays a role in the human reasoning, or lack thereof. The defining values of what triggers that emotional controller, is developed early in life, at least it did for me.
I fell in love with my mother’s younger sister, my aunt. To me, she was the most beautiful thing I had ever seen. She was there when I learned to walk and talk, and once I learned to talk, she laughed at my every joke, no matter how unfunny they were. She was always a friend whose kindness I cherished, and one who never failed to make me laugh. She was the bases for my love search, throughout my life. For me, trying to find a love similar to my first encounter with it, at its adolescent innocence, meant trying to find someone like her, that to describe it in its most simplistic form, meant a woman. Also, given that everything about human nature justified my gender choice, the idea of what I searched for, had merit.
Now, without any intent to go through the varying factors that might lead one to discover or disavow their birth gender, but suffice it to say that there are a number of influences that might trigger an altering life choice. My intent is to question whether those variables are justified. Is making that choice, right or easy?
After millions of years, a humanoid, after birth, has never switched genders internally, and I want to emphasize the point of, never. So, we can conclude that based on the time period alone, it is empirically impossible for anyone to do so. Humanity has supposedly been at its current state of being for over two hundred thousand years, and in that two hundred-thousand-year period, scientifically, a change in a person’s internal gender, after birth, has never occurred. However, there are documented cases where an individual has been born with both male and female parts, and I would imagine, this makes life difficult, but its rarity proves two things.
One is, it’s rare, and two, that when the joining of a man and woman occurs that brings forth a new life, bits of each parent becomes a part of the child, and on rare occasions it fails to make the complete clarification and confusion is created.
At this point in the discussion, some might voice see I told you so, believing this proves that its possible. However, the determination of what that child is, is based on the internal makeup, which defines whether or not that person has the tools to give life or not. Remember, however, that the tools might not work properly, but the relevant factor is that they are in place, consequently terming what the gender of that individual should be. Again, to argue against this attestation, would be similar to saying that humans are a six fingered hand species, and not five, because on rare occasions someone is born with an extra finger on a hand, thus making six normal, instead of the accidental occurrence of nature that it is.
It must be noted, that the sixth finger polydactyly, never functions as a truly supportive factor to that hand’s usage, due to the human history and science facts about how many fingers should be attached to a hand. The extra finger is there, but serves no usable purpose.
Humanity can look at all the information provided by history and science and still, remarkably, come to its own conclusion devoid of the history and science provided that was intended to aid in that decision-making process. The mental ability of the human mind to ignore facts and incorporate a lie is couched in the emotional necessity to do so.
So here we are, men who want to be women and women who want to be men, simply because they’re emotionally attached to the idea, and sexually attracted to that type of sexual relief.
Is it what’s right or what’s easy?
The right thing to do, is remember you can’t change history or ignore science, no matter how easy it is to try.